Résumé
The double-seam can lid sealing process represents a cornerstone of modern packaging technology, fundamental to ensuring the safety, integrity, and shelf-life of a vast array of consumer and industrial goods. This procedure involves the mechanical interlocking of a can body and its corresponding end (lid) through a two-stage rolling operation, culminating in a hermetically sealed container impervious to microbial ingress and atmospheric contamination. A successful seal is contingent upon the precise formation of five overlapping layers of metal, compressed tightly with a sealing compound to eliminate any potential leakage pathways. The integrity of this seal is not a matter of chance but the result of meticulous quality control and a deep understanding of the mechanical dynamics involved. Evaluating the final seam requires a series of critical checks, including the measurement of seam overlap, thickness, length, countersink depth, and a thorough analysis of internal wrinkles. These inspections, both visual and destructive, are indispensable for diagnosing and rectifying imperfections, thereby safeguarding product quality and consumer trust. The quality of the raw components, particularly the can ends, serves as the foundational element upon which a flawless double-seam can lid sealing process is built.
Principaux enseignements
- A hermetic seal is formed by mechanically interlocking the can body and lid.
- The process involves two distinct operations with specific seaming rollers.
- Mastering double-seam can lid sealing prevents product contamination and spoilage.
- Regular teardown inspections are necessary to verify internal seam integrity.
- Seam overlap is the most vital dimension for ensuring a leak-proof container.
- Visual defects like droops or sharp seams indicate serious process errors.
- High-quality can ends are the starting point for a reliable sealing operation.
Table des matières
- The Foundational Anatomy of a Double Seam
- From Can Body to Lid: The Components at Play
- The Two-Act Play: First and Second Operation Rolls
- Check 1: Scrutinizing Seam Overlap and Body Hook Butting
- Defining Seam Overlap: The Heart of the Seal
- The Concept of Body Hook Butting
- Check 2: Measuring Seam Thickness and Seam Length (Height)
- Seam Thickness: A Tale of Tightness
- Seam Length (Height): The Vertical Dimension
- Check 3: Evaluating Countersink Depth for Proper Formation
- The Role of the Countersink
- Reading the Signs: What Countersink Measurements Reveal
- Check 4: Conducting a Wrinkle Analysis (Tightness Rating)
- The Nature of Seam Wrinkles
- From Visual Inspection to Tightness Percentage
- Check 5: Performing Visual and Destructive Seam Inspections
- The External Visual Check: Your First Line of Defense
- The Necessity of the Teardown: A Deeper Look Inside
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- Conclusion
- Références
The Foundational Anatomy of a Double Seam
To truly appreciate the elegance and profound importance of the double seam, we must first journey into its mechanical heart. Imagine for a moment the trust placed in a simple can of soup, beer, or infant formula. We expect its contents to be as fresh and safe as the day they were packaged, whether that was a week or a year ago. That profound trust rests upon a tiny, folded ridge of metal: the double seam. It is not merely a folded edge; it is a precisely engineered structure, a fortress wall in miniature, designed to achieve a hermetic seal. Understanding its anatomy is not just a technical exercise; it is the first step in comprehending the narrative of preservation that unfolds every time a can is sealed. The entire science of double-seam can lid sealing is built upon the interaction of a few key components, brought together in a rapid, two-act mechanical play.
From Can Body to Lid: The Components at Play
Before the seaming process can even begin, we must have our principal actors ready on stage. These are the can body and the can end, or lid. The top edge of the can body is formed into an outward-curled lip known as the flange. Think of the flange as an open arm, waiting to receive the lid. The lid, in turn, has its own corresponding feature: a curled edge designed to fit over and around the flange. This curl is not just a simple curve; it contains a channel lined with a crucial, yet often overlooked, material—the sealing compound. This compound is typically a pliable, rubber-like polymer. When the seam is formed and compressed, this compound will be squeezed into any microscopic imperfections or voids within the metal structure, acting as a gasket to guarantee the seal is airtight and watertight. The dimensions of these components are not arbitrary. They are specified to thousandths of an inch, as the final integrity of the seal depends on their perfect compatibility. The seaming chuck, a part of the seaming machine, acts as an anvil, supporting the lid from the inside during the operation and defining the final internal diameter of the seam.
| Component | Role in Double Seam Formation | Key Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Can Body Flange | The curled lip of the can body that interlocks with the lid. | Must be smooth, free of damage, and of a consistent width. |
| Can End (Lid) Curl | The outer edge of the lid that is designed to wrap around the body flange. | Contains a channel for the sealing compound. Its radius is precisely engineered. |
| Sealing Compound | A pliable polymer lining inside the lid’s curl. | Acts as a gasket to fill microscopic gaps and ensure a hermetic seal. |
| Seaming Chuck | A tool in the seamer that supports the lid from the inside. | Acts as an anvil against which the seam is formed. Its profile dictates the countersink. |
| Seaming Rollers | Two (or more) rollers that shape the metal. | A First Operation Roller for interlocking and a Second Operation Roller for compression. |
The Two-Act Play: First and Second Operation Rolls
The creation of the double seam is a dynamic process, a mechanical ballet performed in two distinct movements. The can, with its contents inside and the lid loosely placed on top, is raised by a lifter plate, pressing the lid firmly against the seaming chuck. The can and chuck then begin to spin at high speed.
The first act begins as the First Operation Roller moves in. Its grooved profile is specifically designed to engage the lid’s curl and the can’s flange. As it presses against the spinning components, it performs a beautiful feat of metal forming: it tucks the lid’s curl under and around the body flange, interlocking the two pieces of metal. The result is a loosely formed seam. If you were to stop the process here and cut the seam open, you would see that the two parts are hooked together, but there is still space between the layers. The sealing compound has not yet been compressed. This first operation is foundational; it sets the stage for the final seal by defining how much metal from the body (the body hook) and the lid (the cover hook) will make up the final structure.
The second act immediately follows. The First Operation Roller retracts, and the Second Operation Roller moves in. This roller has a much flatter, smoother profile. Its job is not to hook but to compress. It presses forcefully against the loosely formed seam, ironing it out and squeezing the five layers of metal (three from the lid, two from the can body) tightly together. This immense pressure forces the sealing compound to flow into every crevice, expelling any trapped air and creating the hermetic seal. The final product is a dense, strong, and impermeable barrier. This two-step process, from a loose interlock to a final, dense compression, is the universal principle behind every successful double-seam can lid sealing operation, from a craft brewery’s canning line to a multinational food processing plant.
Check 1: Scrutinizing Seam Overlap and Body Hook Butting
If the double seam is a fortress, then seam overlap is the thickness of its main wall. It is arguably the single most telling parameter for the integrity and safety of the seal. After the seam is formed, a proper inspection requires us to look inside. This is done through a destructive test where a small section of the seam is cut, and its cross-section is viewed under magnification with a seam scope or digital projector. What we are looking for here is the degree to which the body hook and the cover hook are engaged.
Defining Seam Overlap: The Heart of the Seal
Seam overlap is the physical length of the interlocking hooks. Imagine the cover hook as one hand and the body hook as another, linked together. The overlap is the measure of how much those hands are gripping each other. If the grip is weak (low overlap), the seam can be pulled apart under pressure or during a physical impact, leading to a loss of the hermetic seal. This would allow microorganisms to enter, causing spoilage and potential health hazards. Conversely, while more overlap seems better, an excessive amount can cause other problems, indicating that the hooks were not formed correctly in the first place.
The overlap is calculated with a formula based on the measured lengths of the body hook, the cover hook, and the overall seam length. The result is often expressed as a percentage or a raw measurement in millimeters or inches. Industry standards provide minimum acceptable values for overlap, which vary depending on the type of can, its size, and its intended contents. For example, a carbonated beverage can, which must withstand internal pressure, will have stringent overlap requirements. Achieving the correct seam overlap is a direct result of a properly set up first operation roll. An incorrect setup here will create a fundamental flaw that the second operation cannot fix. It is a testament to the idea that a strong foundation is everything.
The Concept of Body Hook Butting
While overlap tells us about the length of the engagement, body hook butting tells us about the quality and tightness of that engagement. During the second operation, as the seam is compressed, the body hook is squeezed against the solid wall of the seaming chuck. Butting is the measure of how much of the body hook’s length is tightly compressed, expressed as a percentage of the total body hook length. You can think of it as the “wrinkle-free” portion of the body hook.
A high butting percentage (typically 70-90%) indicates a tight seam. The metal has been sufficiently ironed out, and the sealing compound has been properly distributed. However, a value of 100% can be a red flag. It might suggest that the second operation pressure was so extreme that it crushed the body hook, potentially creating a fracture at its base—a flaw that is difficult to see but catastrophic for the seal. This condition is known as a fractured body hook. On the other hand, a low butting percentage signifies a loose seam. There are still excessive wrinkles or voids within the seam’s internal structure, creating potential channels for leaks. It suggests the second operation pressure was insufficient to complete the job started by the first operation. Therefore, monitoring body hook butting is a delicate balancing act, ensuring the seam is tight but not over-compressed to the point of failure.
Check 2: Measuring Seam Thickness and Seam Length (Height)
While the internal geometry of the seam, like overlap and butting, requires destructive testing, there are external dimensions that provide immediate, non-destructive clues about the health of the double-seam can lid sealing process. Seam thickness and seam length (or height) are the two primary external measurements. They are quick to perform with simple gauges and can be the first indicators that a seaming process is drifting out of specification. They act as the vital signs of the seaming machine, providing a continuous pulse on its performance.
Seam Thickness: A Tale of Tightness
Seam thickness is the maximum width of the fully formed double seam. It is measured using a special seam micrometer, which has a notch to fit over the can’s flange, ensuring an accurate reading of the seam itself. This measurement is a direct reflection of the pressure applied during the second operation. A properly formed seam will have a thickness measurement that falls within a very narrow range specified by the can manufacturer.
If the seam is too thick, it is a classic symptom of a loose seam. It suggests that the second operation roll did not apply enough pressure to adequately compress the five layers of metal. The internal structure will likely have insufficient body hook butting and poor wrinkle characteristics. It is a sign of weakness. Conversely, if the seam is too thin, it indicates excessive pressure from the second operation roll. This is a dangerous condition known as a “false seam.” While it may look and feel tight, the extreme pressure may have crushed the metal, potentially fracturing the cover hook or body hook. A seam that is too thin is often weaker and more brittle than one that is properly formed. Therefore, seam thickness is not a case of “tighter is better.” It is a case of precision. The goal is to hit the target specification, a “Goldilocks” value that is just right.
| Common Defect | Primary Cause(s) | Corrective Action | Potential Consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loose Seam (Thick) | Insufficient 2nd operation pressure; Worn 2nd operation roll. | Increase 2nd operation roll pressure; Replace worn tooling. | Microbial leakage; Spoilage. |
| Tight Seam (Thin) | Excessive 2nd operation pressure; Incorrect roller profile. | Decrease 2nd operation roll pressure; Verify correct tooling. | Fractured hook; False seam. |
| Short Body Hook | Incorrect 1st operation setting; Worn 1st operation roll. | Adjust 1st operation roll; Replace roll. | Insufficient seam overlap; Leaks. |
| Excessive Wrinkles | Loose 1st operation; Worn chuck; Incorrect pressure. | Tighten 1st operation; Check chuck specs; Adjust 2nd op pressure. | Leakage through wrinkle channels. |
| Cut-Over / Sharp Seam | Excessive 2nd operation pressure; Worn seaming chuck. | Reduce 2nd operation pressure; Replace chuck. | Seam is cut, leading to fracture. |
Seam Length (Height): The Vertical Dimension
Seam length, sometimes called seam height, is the vertical dimension of the seam. It is measured from the top of the seam to the bottom, where it meets the can body. This dimension is primarily controlled by the setup of the first operation roll and the lifter pressure of the seaming machine. While it might seem less directly related to the hermetic seal than thickness or overlap, its consistency is a powerful diagnostic tool.
A seam length that is too short can indicate that the first operation roll is set too loose, not gathering enough metal to form a proper hook. This will almost certainly result in insufficient seam overlap. A seam length that is too long, on the other hand, can suggest that the first operation is too tight, which can put undue stress on the metal. More importantly, variations in seam length from can to can on the same machine are a major warning sign. This inconsistency could point to a wobbly or worn-out seaming roll, a problem with the lifter mechanism that raises the can, or inconsistent can components. Consistent seam length is a sign of a stable and repeatable process, which is the ultimate goal of any quality assurance program in canning. It assures us that the foundation laid by the first operation is solid and uniform every single time.
Check 3: Evaluating Countersink Depth for Proper Formation
Moving from the seam itself, our attention now turns to the area where the seam meets the main panel of the can lid. This small, recessed area is known as the countersink, and its depth is another subtle yet meaningful parameter in the double-seam can lid sealing process. The countersink depth is the vertical distance from the top edge of the seam down to the flat center panel of the lid. It is dictated by the shape of the seaming chuck and the pressure exerted by the seamer’s lifter plate. While it might seem like a minor detail, an incorrect countersink depth can lead to a cascade of problems that compromise the entire seal.
The Role of the Countersink
The primary function of the countersink is to provide a precise recess for the seaming chuck to sit in. During the seaming operation, the chuck acts as an anvil, a solid base against which the rollers form the metal. For this to happen correctly, the chuck must fit snugly against the lid without interference. The countersink must be deep enough to fully accommodate the flange of the seaming chuck. If the countersink is too shallow, the chuck cannot seat properly. Instead, it might “ride” on the can body’s flange, failing to provide a solid anvil for the second operation. This leads to a loose, improperly compressed seam.
Furthermore, the countersink must guide the lid onto the can body correctly, ensuring it is centered before the operation begins. It is the first point of contact and alignment. A well-formed countersink ensures that the subsequent mechanical actions are performed on a stable and correctly positioned assembly. This precision is why sourcing from a reliable manufacturer of components like food and beverage can bottom ends is the first step in a stable process; the consistency of the end itself dictates the potential for a consistent countersink.
Reading the Signs: What Countersink Measurements Reveal
Measuring the countersink depth is typically done with a specialized gauge. The readings provide direct feedback on the seamer’s setup. A countersink that is too deep is often a sign of excessive pressure from the lifter plate. The lifter is pushing the can and lid assembly up against the chuck with too much force. This can strain the metal at the junction between the seam and the lid panel, creating a sharp, weak point that could fracture under pressure, especially in carbonated beverage cans or aerosol cans.
Conversely, a countersink that is too shallow is a clear indicator of insufficient lifter pressure or an issue with the tooling itself, such as a worn chuck or an incorrect chuck/lid combination. As mentioned, this can cause the chuck to ride the can flange, preventing the second operation roll from doing its job effectively. The result is almost always a loose seam with poor tightness and insufficient overlap. Therefore, the countersink measurement serves as a check on the vertical forces at play in the seaming machine. It ensures that the can is presented to the rollers with just the right amount of pressure—firm enough to create a solid base for forming the seam, but not so forceful as to damage the components. It is a measure of finesse in a process that is otherwise defined by immense mechanical force.
Check 4: Conducting a Wrinkle Analysis (Tightness Rating)
We now venture into the most intricate part of the seam’s interior: the cover hook. After a seam is torn down for inspection, the cover hook is carefully separated and examined for one specific characteristic: wrinkles. At first glance, the presence of any wrinkles might seem like a flaw. However, in the world of double seaming, the reality is more nuanced. A perfectly smooth, wrinkle-free cover hook is not always the goal and can sometimes be a sign of a problem itself. The art lies in evaluating the degree and nature of the wrinkles to assign a tightness rating. This analysis gives us the most direct assessment of how well the second operation has done its job of ironing out and sealing the seam.
The Nature of Seam Wrinkles
Wrinkles are the small, wave-like folds that form on the radius of the cover hook. They are a natural byproduct of the first operation. During this initial stage, the lid’s curl is bent around the can’s flange. As this metal is bent into a tight curve, the material on the inside of the curve compresses and naturally forms these small wrinkles. They are unavoidable at this stage.
The entire purpose of the second operation is to apply sufficient pressure to flatten, or “iron out,” these first-operation wrinkles. As the second operation roll compresses the seam, it forces the metal of the cover hook to conform tightly to the shape of the body hook. A successful second operation will leave a cover hook that is mostly smooth, especially along the “flat” portion that is in direct contact with the body hook. Any remaining wrinkles are typically confined to the very edge of the cover hook radius. The quality, length, and tightness of these residual wrinkles are what we evaluate.
From Visual Inspection to Tightness Percentage
After a teardown, the cover hook is visually inspected, and the wrinkles are rated. This is often done by grading the wrinkle on a percentage scale, which is known as the tightness rating. A rating of 100% would signify a completely smooth cover hook with no visible wrinkles. A rating of 70% would mean that the wrinkles extend 30% of the way down the cover hook’s length.
The acceptable tightness rating varies based on the product. For a simple can of vegetables, a tightness rating of 70% or higher might be perfectly acceptable. However, for pressurized products like aerosol cans or carbonated beverages, the requirement is much stricter, often demanding ratings of 90% or higher. A low tightness rating indicates a loose seam. The wrinkles create tiny, continuous channels that can allow gas to escape or bacteria to enter, even if the seam passes external dimensional checks.
It is also possible for a seam to be too tight. A 100% tight seam, while seemingly perfect, might indicate that the second operation pressure was so excessive that it stretched the metal to its limit. This can make the seam brittle and prone to fracture. The ideal is a high tightness rating that is achieved without creating other defects like a thin seam or a fractured hook. This wrinkle analysis is a deeply human part of the process, relying on the trained eye of a quality technician to interpret the story told by the metal. It reveals the true quality of the compression, the final act in the double-seam can lid sealing drama.
Check 5: Performing Visual and Destructive Seam Inspections
All the measurements and analyses we have discussed culminate in two fundamental quality control practices: the external visual inspection and the internal destructive inspection, or teardown. These two methods work in concert to provide a complete picture of seam quality. The visual check is the rapid, ongoing patrol that monitors the line’s health, while the teardown is the deep, forensic investigation that confirms the internal integrity. A robust quality program relies on both. A commitment to this level of rigorous quality control, as detailed by leading companies like Worunda, involves a philosophy where both visual and destructive testing are seen as indispensable.
The External Visual Check: Your First Line of Defense
Before any gauges are used or seams are cut, the first inspection is done with the most sensitive instruments available: the human eye and hand. A trained operator can spot a multitude of potential problems simply by looking at and feeling the finished seam. This check should be performed frequently, ideally on every can coming off the line or at regular, short intervals.
Common external defects include:
- Droop or Sag: A condition where the seam hangs down below the bottom of the can body flange. This is a clear sign of a loose first operation.
- Vee or Spur: A sharp point or “V” shape appearing on the seam, often caused by a broken piece of metal from the can getting caught in the seam. It creates a definite leakage path.
- Sharp Seam: The top inside edge of the seam feels sharp to the touch. This indicates excessive second operation pressure, a precursor to a cut-over.
- Cut-Over: A condition where the top of the seam is so compressed that it has been sheared by the seaming chuck. The seam is literally cut and is on the verge of complete failure.
- False Seam: This is the most insidious of visual defects. The seam may look dimensionally correct and feel tight, but due to a misalignment or error (like the chuck skidding on the lid), the hooks have not actually engaged. The lid is merely folded against the body, with no interlock. It provides no seal whatsoever.
Catching these defects visually allows for immediate intervention, preventing the production of thousands of faulty cans. It is the first and most effective line of defense in any double-seam can lid sealing operation.
The Necessity of the Teardown: A Deeper Look Inside
As valuable as the visual check is, it cannot see inside the seam. It cannot measure overlap, evaluate body hook butting, or accurately rate wrinkle tightness. For that, a destructive teardown inspection is necessary. This involves taking a can off the line at a scheduled interval (e.g., once every hour or at the start of every shift), cutting the seam off, and meticulously dismantling it.
The process involves using seam cutters to make two cuts, isolating a section of the seam. This section is then either prepared for cross-sectional viewing with a seam projector or physically torn down. The teardown involves carefully peeling the cover hook away from the body hook. Once separated, the internal components can be measured with a gauge and visually inspected. This is where the true integrity of the seam is confirmed. The inspector will check for a pressure ridge, a small impression on the inside of the can body that indicates the second operation pressure was sufficient. They will measure the body hook and cover hook lengths. Most importantly, they will perform the wrinkle analysis described earlier. The teardown provides the definitive, objective data that validates the entire process. It is the final word on whether the seam is fit for purpose, capable of protecting the product and the consumer.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is a hermetic seal and why is double-seaming the best way to achieve it?
A hermetic seal is a type of sealing that is completely airtight. In the context of canning, this means it prevents the passage of air, water vapor, and, most importantly, microorganisms. Double-seaming is the preferred method for metal cans because it creates an exceptionally strong mechanical lock. The process of interlocking five layers of metal and compressing them with a sealing compound creates a tortuous path that is virtually impossible for contaminants to navigate, ensuring long-term product stability without refrigeration.
Can I reuse can lids for double-seaming?
No, can lids should never be reused for double-seaming. The lid’s curl and, critically, the sealing compound within it are designed for a single use. The seaming process permanently deforms the metal and compresses the compound. Attempting to reseal a used lid would result in a failed hermetic seal, as the compound would be hardened and the metal fatigued, making a proper interlock and compression impossible.
What is the difference between a first and second operation seam defect?
A first operation defect is a foundational flaw related to the initial interlocking of the hooks. Examples include an incorrect seam length or a short body hook, which directly lead to insufficient seam overlap. These cannot be corrected by the second operation. A second operation defect relates to the final compression of the seam. Examples include a seam that is too thick (loose) or too thin (tight), or a cover hook with excessive wrinkles. These are typically caused by incorrect pressure settings on the second operation roll.
How often should I perform seam inspections?
The frequency of inspections depends on the operation’s scale, the product’s sensitivity, and regulatory requirements. A general best practice includes continuous visual inspection by the operator, with dimensional checks (thickness, length, countersink) performed on several cans every 30-60 minutes. A full, destructive teardown inspection should be conducted at the start of every shift, after any major shutdown or adjustment, and when changing can or lid batches.
What is a “false seam” and how can I detect it?
A false seam is a critical defect where the can body and lid are not properly interlocked, even though they may appear to be sealed. It often happens if the seaming chuck “skids” or fails to engage the lid properly. The lid curl is simply folded against the body flange without forming the crucial hooks. A false seam can sometimes be detected visually by its unusual appearance or by feeling that it is not properly formed, but the only definitive way to confirm it is through a teardown inspection, which will reveal the complete lack of a body hook and cover hook engagement.
Are the requirements for beer can ends different from food can ends?
Yes, the requirements can be significantly different. Beer and other carbonated beverages generate internal pressure, which exerts an outward force on the can ends and the double seam. Therefore, the double-seam can lid sealing specifications for top and bottom ends of beer cans are extremely stringent, demanding higher overlap percentages, specific tightness ratings, and robust countersink profiles to prevent buckling or leaking under pressure. Non-carbonated food cans, while still requiring a perfect hermetic seal against external contaminants, do not have to withstand the same level of internal pressure, so their specifications, while still precise, may be different.
Conclusion
The double seam is more than a simple closure; it is a marvel of mechanical engineering, a silent guardian that underpins the safety and stability of the global food supply chain. Its formation is a dance of precision, where steel rollers and immense pressure converge to create an impregnable barrier. Yet, this process is not infallible. As we have explored, achieving a flawless seal is a continuous endeavor, a dialogue between the machine and its operator. The five critical checks—evaluating overlap and butting, measuring external dimensions, assessing countersink depth, analyzing wrinkles, and performing diligent inspections—are not merely steps in a quality control manual. They are the language of that dialogue.
Each measurement, each visual cue, tells a story about the forces at play. They allow us to translate the subtle shifts in the process into actionable knowledge, to correct a deviation before it becomes a failure. The journey to a perfect double-seam can lid sealing process does not begin when the can meets the seamer, but much earlier. It starts with the selection of high-quality, consistent components, from the can body to the precisely manufactured ends. Ultimately, the integrity of what is inside the can is a direct reflection of the integrity of the process that sealed it—a process that blends the unyielding power of machinery with the irreplaceable value of human diligence and expertise.
Références
Levapack. (2020, March 31). How do you use a can sealer – In-depth guide. https://www.levapack.com/how-do-you-use-a-can-sealer-an-in-depth-guide/
Levapack. (2021, June 29). A complete guide on double seaming. https://www.levapack.com/double-seaming-guide/
Mundolatas. (2019, March 30). Elements of the double seal. https://mundolatas.com/en/elements-of-the-seam/
Seam School. (n.d.). About – Seam School – Craft seaming – Double seams explained. Retrieved August 26, 2025, from https://seamschool.com/
Worunda. (2024, November 4). Several main methods and principles of can lid sealing. https://www.worunda.com/several-main-methods-and-principles-of-can-lid-sealing/